Blog Entry 4 (Saturday 19/5/07)--- article attached below
First it was a Korean at Virginia Tech, brutally and mercilessly gunning 33 people to death—a horrible, but isolated, incident.
Or so we thought.
Then it was a woman bludgeoning her husband to death and then dismembering him, and depositing him literally all over Tokyo, and now, most recently, we have a teenage boy beheading his sleeping mother hours before her birthday, then nonchalantly reporting himself to the police carrying his mother’s head. And showing no signs of guilt and remorse whatsoever.
Such callous inhumanity seems almost detached from the real world—like a scene from a particularly macabre slasher/horror movie. And yet, when I reads articles, stunned as I am, I must pause to think: why?
What is the world coming to?
We like to think that as technology progresses and the world seems so become more and more moulded around the human, that we have intrinsically progressed—hut here science and the humanities disagree. The humanities say: no, nothing has changed, or we have got worse, which the sciences scream at us everyday with their amazing breakthroughs that are leaps in human history. The sciences, however seem to have done nothing more than lead us to pursure destructive interests in more fascinating ways.
Why would a mere teenager kills his own flesh and blood on the eve of her birthday for no apparent reason? The factors are myriad, but here are a possible few.
Firstly, it is common knowledge among most students that Japan has been the largest source of sexually violent comics which graphically display people killing in macabre fashions distinctly reminescent of the Maquis de Sade’s 120 Days of Sodom, almost always with cruel detachment or unrestrained delight. And of course, the largest market for such films is in Japan, where surveys have shown many teenagers to be wildly addicted. Psychological studies have shown that watching such violent and sexually suggestive material has a subliminal, pervasive effect on the human mind, that, while unconscious, has a profound effect of the way a person thinks and precieves the people around him in relation to himself. If the teenager who commited this terrible crime had been reading these comics over a long period, he could easily been sunconsciously manipulated such that he came to believe such an action was within his full moral capability to do so, and for some reason that remains undisclosed even in the article, decided that butchering his mother was the way to go.
Secondly, in a society that is progessively becoming more liberal, we must recognise that there is an increased propensity for such violence to grow. When a person lives in a relatively tightly bound society where morality is defined as something absolute, there is little or no chance for such incidents to occor. On the other hand, liberal societies, on the basis of the right to freedom of choice, tend to emphazise a person’s freedom to believe whatever he/she believes in. This is the precedent for people in liberal societies tending to take sex and other related issues very lightly, a fact which the diminishing age of Criminal Responsibility attests to. Japan being a liberal society, there is a lot of space in which this teenager could have explored his murderous desires—via the omnipresent, uncensorable, unmonitorable medium of the internet, for example. But now, he is confined to a dark cell, where his freedom is practically nonexistent. The final message of this all?
Freedom therefore is only useful when excersied within moral boundaries—live with absolute freedom, and lose all of it.
(498 words)
ARTICLE:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/asiapcf/05/15/japan.boy.arrest.reut/index.html
TOKYO, Japan (AP) -- A teenage boy carrying a severed head walked into a Japanese police station Tuesday saying he killed his mother, the latest in a series of grisly dismemberments that have horrified a nation renowned for its low crime rate.
The 17-year-old suspect led officers to his house in northern Fukushima prefecture (state) and pointed out his headless mother on her futon mattress, with a frank, "It's in here," Kyodo News reported.
He told police he beheaded his mother on the eve of her 47th birthday while she slept, and added, "It didn't matter who I killed," Kyodo reported. Police confirmed the arrest.
Japan has long prided itself on safe streets and low incidents of violent crime. But the latest killing triggered soul searching about what some worry is a disturbing new trend -- particularly with its mix of youthful aggression and icy remorselessness.
"If true, it's horrifying," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki said.
Last year, a jobless man allegedly cut up his mother and entombed her body parts in concrete-filled buckets left abandoned in a yard.
In January, Tokyo was put on edge when a woman confessed to dismembering her husband with a saw and dumping the parts around the capital.
Then just weeks ago, the nation was riveted by a high-profile verdict in the death of a British bar hostess whose body was also dismembered and stashed in a seaside cave.
While dismemberment crimes are not unique to Japan, experts say such cases are on the rise as the country grapples with the fallout of a decade of economic malaise. Alienation and a trend toward objectifying fellow humans are also fueling the violence.
"There have been a high number of incidents involving dismembered bodies and I certainly think there is a chain reaction going on," said Susumu Oda, an expert in criminal psychology at Japan's Tezukayamagakuin University.
Tuesday's case recalls a 1997 slaying in which a 14-year-old boy beheaded an 11-year-old and left the head at a school gate with a sinister note stuffed in the mouth.
That case spurred widespread debate about tougher laws against juvenile offenders.
Dismemberments made headlines again last year when a man in western Japan reportedly cut up his mother's body and encased the remains in concrete buckets.
The 37-year-old suspect also allegedly roasted some of the parts on an electric grill before throwing them in the garbage, apparently to delay decomposition and hide the odor.
In the January case, a woman confessed to bludgeoning her husband with a wine bottle, sawing the corpse in pieces and dumping his body parts around Tokyo.
The confession ended a murder mystery that began the previous month when a man's torso was found in a garbage bag on a Tokyo street.
The man's legs were later found at a separate location in Tokyo and his head was discovered in a suburban park weeks later. The woman told police that her husband had physically and emotionally abused her, local media reported.
Late last month, a serial rapist was sentenced to life in prison for nine attacks, but was cleared of raping and dismembering a British woman after a six-year trial that detailed one of Japan's most disturbing sex crimes.
The British victim, Lucie Blackman, worked at a hostess bar frequented by the suspect, and her body was discovered in a cave near his house -- her head also encased in concrete. While the suspect was convicted on other charges, the court said there was no solid evidence linking him to the Briton's death.
While such gruesome killings have outraged the nation, some experts caution that the dismembering of victims is not always a symptom of deeper social disfunction.
"In many cases, they killed in a desperate situation and carried or hid the body by dismembering it to avoid being caught for homicide," said Yoshikazu Yuuma, an expert in criminal psychology at Saitama Institute of Technology outside Tokyo.
Monday
Raised in China, Studied English in Singapore, and now, they want to go on to the west
This article fits the categories of social and educational. It is taken from the special report of the Saturday's newspaper.
Blog Entry 3 (Sunday-- 20th May 2007)
Singapore admits a large number of China scholars each year. It is amazing but the following reasons may justify.
Firstly, leaving China at such a young age is tough. Having to face uncertainties. Like the boys in the article, these scholars leave their families and travel alone. I absolutely disagree with the article stating that they leave their homeland just to be different from their peers.
Secondly, it is a great and courageous decision to choose to study in a junior college in Singapore where medium of instructions virtually is English. A language totally contrast with what they learn in their homeland, Mandarin.
Furthermore, to study in an elite college where academic performance is very demanding. I have several China scholars in my class. The fact that they are very hardworking and determined to master English proves that most of them come here with the sincere intention, couple with compassion, of taking the challenge because of future gains.
Frankly, I am humbled by such a challenge. I would not take such challenge. To me, the Chinese scholars are very farsighted and that impresses me because they are able to see long term benefits and take risks to push themselves to achieve these benefits, which eventually make them stronger and wiser.
There have been projections that soon, China’s robust economy will dominate the global economy. (With wealth, it may become a super military power.) That seems to be proving true as more younger Chinese are taking such challenges. The scholars in the article expressed interest in carving a niche in the western society in future. This is proof of their foresight on need for globalization. Indirectly or directly, they are doing both themselves and their motherland a favour in return.
In the small and self-reliance red dot, Singapore must not only think that the primary purpose of admitting Chinese scholars is to nurture them so that in future, they might help us globalize. We cannot rely on that. Rather, their presence and their own background serves as a reminder and an avenue of reflections for us Singaporean students. We should eradicate the prejudice of their act as being over ambitious or selfish opportunists to become global expansionist or jealous about them overtaking us in future. Singapore market is too small. We must heed the government’s call on globalization.
Personally, I feel guilty because I am honestly not courageous or farsighted enough to emulate these scholars. Are we courageous enough like them venturing out, expecting risks and uncertainties, to pursue excellence? Sadly, I do not think so. We are too pampered!!! Thus, the Chinese scholars’ examples echo an urgent concern here in Singapore. Opportunities and risks are plenty. Do we dare to take such challenges?
(494 words)
Blog Entry 3 (Sunday-- 20th May 2007)
When I first read this article, guilt overwhelmed me. I suddenly realized how we as Singaporeans are overly complacent with our supposedly elite education system and never though of exploring out of the box like the Chinese scholars.
Singapore admits a large number of China scholars each year. It is amazing but the following reasons may justify.
Firstly, leaving China at such a young age is tough. Having to face uncertainties. Like the boys in the article, these scholars leave their families and travel alone. I absolutely disagree with the article stating that they leave their homeland just to be different from their peers.
Secondly, it is a great and courageous decision to choose to study in a junior college in Singapore where medium of instructions virtually is English. A language totally contrast with what they learn in their homeland, Mandarin.
Furthermore, to study in an elite college where academic performance is very demanding. I have several China scholars in my class. The fact that they are very hardworking and determined to master English proves that most of them come here with the sincere intention, couple with compassion, of taking the challenge because of future gains.
Frankly, I am humbled by such a challenge. I would not take such challenge. To me, the Chinese scholars are very farsighted and that impresses me because they are able to see long term benefits and take risks to push themselves to achieve these benefits, which eventually make them stronger and wiser.
There have been projections that soon, China’s robust economy will dominate the global economy. (With wealth, it may become a super military power.) That seems to be proving true as more younger Chinese are taking such challenges. The scholars in the article expressed interest in carving a niche in the western society in future. This is proof of their foresight on need for globalization. Indirectly or directly, they are doing both themselves and their motherland a favour in return.
In the small and self-reliance red dot, Singapore must not only think that the primary purpose of admitting Chinese scholars is to nurture them so that in future, they might help us globalize. We cannot rely on that. Rather, their presence and their own background serves as a reminder and an avenue of reflections for us Singaporean students. We should eradicate the prejudice of their act as being over ambitious or selfish opportunists to become global expansionist or jealous about them overtaking us in future. Singapore market is too small. We must heed the government’s call on globalization.
Personally, I feel guilty because I am honestly not courageous or farsighted enough to emulate these scholars. Are we courageous enough like them venturing out, expecting risks and uncertainties, to pursue excellence? Sadly, I do not think so. We are too pampered!!! Thus, the Chinese scholars’ examples echo an urgent concern here in Singapore. Opportunities and risks are plenty. Do we dare to take such challenges?
(494 words)
Friday
MOE to help raise standards in special schools
Thursday, March 8 2007
This article fits the category of education and social contexts. It is taken from The Straits Times of Thursday, March 8 2007
This article fits the category of education and social contexts. It is taken from The Straits Times of Thursday, March 8 2007
I have always lived by the principle that everyone in society should be treated equally and justifiably fairly.
The ministry of education has finally taken steps after several unanswered calls from the MPs to focus more on education quality in special schools such that they do not lose out. These people receiving special education include to people are disabled physical or mentally as well as poorer children who cannot afford to study in mainstream school.
This word “special” termed for their education system should indicate the difference in the approach of teaching them (perhaps methods, pace etc.), but standard of the education should not be specially compromised.
They are already at a natural disadvantage. Some are visually or hearing impaired. Others are autistic or have certain diseases. Nevertheless, they themselves are humans, innocent ones. Doesn’t it show clearly that we should shift our focus more on these children not as a sign of sympathy but a genuine concern to allow them to be integrated into society?
Our government always emphasizes equal opportunities amongst citizens. However, evident in the article, all the while it hasn’t been in context of education. If the education ministry keeps focusing on developing the normal students and grooming them into serving elites or elite servants of the nation, won’t it eventually create a greater social gap between the normal and these special students which is undeniably unwelcome? Children shouldn’t be underprivileged and therefore these efforts are implemented from as elementary as pre-school level.
Fortunately, plans have been implemented like working with special schools to develop targets for learning outcomes, and help audit these schools for quality assurance. More resources will be deposited but what I favour most is the effort and plan to integrate this children into the mainstream education system or satellite classes.
This word “special” termed for their education system should indicate the difference in the approach of teaching them (perhaps methods, pace etc.), but standard of the education should not be specially compromised.
They are already at a natural disadvantage. Some are visually or hearing impaired. Others are autistic or have certain diseases. Nevertheless, they themselves are humans, innocent ones. Doesn’t it show clearly that we should shift our focus more on these children not as a sign of sympathy but a genuine concern to allow them to be integrated into society?
Our government always emphasizes equal opportunities amongst citizens. However, evident in the article, all the while it hasn’t been in context of education. If the education ministry keeps focusing on developing the normal students and grooming them into serving elites or elite servants of the nation, won’t it eventually create a greater social gap between the normal and these special students which is undeniably unwelcome? Children shouldn’t be underprivileged and therefore these efforts are implemented from as elementary as pre-school level.
Fortunately, plans have been implemented like working with special schools to develop targets for learning outcomes, and help audit these schools for quality assurance. More resources will be deposited but what I favour most is the effort and plan to integrate this children into the mainstream education system or satellite classes.
This clearly shows the confidence, determination of the government and assurance to parents to raise this nation with equality in terms of education and given equal opportunities to return his service. Given the number of special schools here, I am convinced the focus of implementation will be more central and feasible.
I personally am very fortunate to receive well rounded education. Though I pity those who are disabled, I am inclined to poorer children. They are physically normal and have the potential to be developed, thus capable in serving the nation. Yet, from such a young age, their future has been ruined because of financial difficulties. The government, interested in raising a capable nation, has taken the initiative to provide funding.
From parents’ perspectives, their only wish is to see their children being treated equally even though they are disadvantaged and in term be able to serve capably in a reasonable capacity. Mindsets of disadvantaged or poorer people doing manual or blue collar worker’s jobs will soon be removed because I trust that with efforts to raise standards (quality, resources etc.) on special education, they can be integrated into normal society and be capable in serving the nation and himself in future.
I personally am very fortunate to receive well rounded education. Though I pity those who are disabled, I am inclined to poorer children. They are physically normal and have the potential to be developed, thus capable in serving the nation. Yet, from such a young age, their future has been ruined because of financial difficulties. The government, interested in raising a capable nation, has taken the initiative to provide funding.
From parents’ perspectives, their only wish is to see their children being treated equally even though they are disadvantaged and in term be able to serve capably in a reasonable capacity. Mindsets of disadvantaged or poorer people doing manual or blue collar worker’s jobs will soon be removed because I trust that with efforts to raise standards (quality, resources etc.) on special education, they can be integrated into normal society and be capable in serving the nation and himself in future.
(499 words)
Ties between Malaysia and Singapore are "good and getting better"
Thursday, March 8, 2007
In this increasingly globalised world, I see that the strongest assurance of Singapore’s continued growth is to forge and maintain positive diplomatic relationships with neighbouring countries.
This blog response fits the category of political and social context. It is taken from Tuesday, March 6 2007, The Straits Times.
Close bilateral ties equate to peace.
In this increasingly globalised world, I see that the strongest assurance of Singapore’s continued growth is to forge and maintain positive diplomatic relationships with neighbouring countries.
It is important because of its geographical proximity. Neighbouring ties provide a direct and more immediate support for each other in terms of resources and defence etc.
Singapore is only a tiny red dot. We have no natural resources. Without close relationship with our neighbours, we may not know who to turn to in the event of crisis. This was exactly the problem faced in recent years where Singapore and Malaysia had some disagreements on certain bilateral matters and prompted some Malaysian politicians threatening cutting water supply to us.
In my opinion; the obstacle to close ties is the lack of open-mindedness and mutual understanding. This time, it was the accomplishment of these two criteria that relationships improved.
As stated, not all current bilateral problems have been solved but it is the implementations of new initiatives on each side by not only seeing, but acting on the importance of stronger ties. These help to kick start a new phase of good relationship. Examples such as holding retreats which will foster closer relationships between senior government officials at various levels, as also were reported in the news.
From both governments’ perspectives, they welcome initiatives which will strengthen mutual relationships. Malaysia gets an advantage by gaining ideas and economic help in their mass development of large undeveloped land. Singapore has done tremendous good deeds (infrastructure development, economic and social assistance) for her citizens and I am very sure they would go the extra mile in helping the welfare of other countries in the region.
According to the article, it stresses that close cooperation benefits the people. I am a part of this small nation. My government has done its job in ensuring mutual trust and we directly benefit as a nation, overcoming our disadvantage of lack of resources and the need for mutual protection. However, what is the long term mutual benefit which all citizens and government aim to find?
It is undeniably ensuing long term peace. Peace can solve social problems (wars which is dreadful for Singapore). Material needs are essential but harmony between neighbouring nations is important. It is now up to each and every individual to ensure maintaining of this relationship.
Not only education or mindset but actions must be contributed evidently by individuals. Acts of mutual respect, understanding and kindness can aid in improving personal bonds even if we might not know that person of neighbouring countries. Though I admit that I myself do not make friends when in Malaysia but I simply respect them and their culture.
Therefore, as much as I would want to commend both governments on initiatives to a new phase of relationship, I would like to stress that individuals like me and you can make a difference in motivating and strengthening ties.
(481 words)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)